It's all downhill from here. Well, okay, not so much downhill as it is a matter of figuring out all the edge cases, which, as we data miners know, is always the time-consuming part. I'll even toss out a prediction: we'll spend at least the next ten years working on exactly that problem, until someone comes up with a generalization that works and stuns everyone with its simplicity and common sense.
Philosophical question for you, me, and Dr. Shulgin: how would the DEA respond to a researcher using a non-scheduled halogenated phenethylamine with a radioactive tracer to study 5HT-2 receptor activity in a neuron-brained robot? What if the neurons are cloned human neurons?
Philosophical question for you, me, and Dr. Shulgin: how would the DEA respond to a researcher using a non-scheduled halogenated phenethylamine with a radioactive tracer to study 5HT-2 receptor activity in a neuron-brained robot? What if the neurons are cloned human neurons?


Comments
I am genuinely hoping that the research at Reading helps the state of the art in ab initio AI research move forward. We're going to learn a lot about how wet neural networks self-organise from this. It's totally what I want to be doing with my life right now.
Also, have you seen this Robot pills
http://www.kuleuven.be/ck/internati